Subjetividades de la Megaurbe Mexicana: de la Articulación Estética a la Partici Ivonne Sánchez Becerril, Sebastian Thies, Arturo Alvarado Bonilla Artigas Editores |
La Configuración Corporativa del Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores del Seguro S Ocampo Merlo, Rodrigo Eduardo Bonilla Artigas Editores |
Poder Social. Instituciones de Participación Ciudadana Armando Rendón Corona Bonilla Artigas Editores |
Contrapoder y Dominación: la Paradójica Experiencia del Poder en Lo Político Mora Martínez, Roberto Bonilla Artigas Editores |
Derecho, Despojo y Luchas Sociales: Análisis Sociojurídicos y Testimonios de Lu Hernández Cervantes, Aleida; López Bárcenas, Francisco Bonilla Artigas Editores |
Mujeres en Círculo: Espiritualidad y Corporalidad Femenina Ramírez Morales, María del Rosario Bonilla Artigas Editores |
Por una Sociedad Más Justa: Mujeres Comunistasen México, 1919-1935 Cueva Tazzer, María de Lourdes Bonilla Artigas Editores |
¿Cómo Comprender Lo Social Para Colaborar en Su Cambio? Diego Quintana, Roberto Bonilla Artigas Editores |
Título: Nature And Antiquities: The Making Of Archaeology In The Americas | ||
Autor: Philip L. Kohl | Precio: $1020.00 | |
Editorial: University Of Arizona | Año: 2014 | |
Tema: Ciencias Sociales, Arqueologia | Edición: 1ª | |
Sinopsis | ISBN: 9780816531127 | |
Nature and Antiquities examines the relation between the natural sciences, anthropology, and archaeology in the Americas in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Taking the reader across the Americas from the Southern Cone to Canada, across the Andes, the Brazilian Amazon, Mesoamerica, and the United States, the book explores the early history of archaeology from a Pan-American perspective.
The volume breaks new ground by entreating archaeologists to acknowledge the importance of ways of knowing that resulted from the study of nature in the history of archaeology. Some of the contributions to this volume trace the part conventions, practices, and concepts from natural history and the natural sciences played in the history and making of the discipline. Others set out to uncover, reassemble, or adjust our vision of collections that research historians of archaeology have disregarded or misrepresented_because their nineteenth-century makers would refuse to comply with today's disciplinary borders and study natural specimens and antiquities in conjunction, under the rubric of the territorial, the curious or the universal. Other contributions trace the sociopolitical implications of studying nature in conjunction with "indigenous peoples" in the Americas_inquiring into what it meant and entailed to comprehend the inhabitants of the American continent in and through a state of nature. |