![]() |
Didáctica, Léxico y Comunicación Cortez Pérez, Gabriela; Acosta Cadengo, Martha Cecilia Bonilla Artigas Editores |
![]() |
Thomas Kuhn, Revoluciones y Paradigmas: una Breve Historia de la Lingüística Company Company, Concepción Colegio Nacional |
![]() |
Problemas de Cabecera: Pensados Durante Horas de Vigilia Carroll, Lewis (Charles L. Dodgson) Bonilla Artigas Editores |
![]() |
Elementos de Lógica Argumentativa Para la Escritura Académica Beller Taboada, Walter Bonilla Artigas Editores |
![]() |
Melchor Oyaguren de Santa Inés, Arte de la Lengua Japona (1738) Zwartjes, Otto (Ed) Iberoamericana Vervuert |
![]() |
Lenguas en Diálogo: el Iberorromance y Su Diversidad Lingúística y Literaria Döhla, Hans-Jörg / Montero Muñoz, Raquel / Báez de Aguilar G Iberoamericana Vervuert |
![]() |
Lengua, La, ¿Patria Común?: Ideas e Ideologías del Español Del Valle, José (Ed.) Iberoamericana Vervuert |
![]() ![]() |
Título: Where Does Binding Theory Apply? | |
Autor: Lebeaux David | Precio: $350.00 | |
Editorial: The Mit Press | Año: 2009 | |
Tema: Lingsistica, Estudio, Analisis | Edición: 1ª | |
Sinopsis | ISBN: 9780262512718 | |
This concise but wide-ranging monograph examines where the conditions of binding theory apply and in doing so considers the nature of phrase structure (in particular how case and theta roles apply) and the nature of the lexical/functional split.
David Lebeaux begins with a revised formulation of binding theory. He reexamines Chomsky's conjecture that all conditions apply at the interfaces, in particular LF (or Logical Form), and argues instead that all negative conditions, in particular Condition C, apply continuously throughout the derivation. Lebeaux draws a distinction between positive and negative conditions, which have different privileges of occurrence according to the architecture of the grammar. Negative conditions, he finds, apply homogeneously throughout the derivation; positive conditions apply solely at LF. A hole in Condition C then forces a reconsideration of the whole architecture of the grammar. He finds that case and theta representations are split apart and are only fused at later points in the derivation, after movement has applied. Lebeaux's exploration of the relationship between case and theta theory reveals a relationship of greater subtlety and importance than is generally assumed. His arguments should interest syntacticians and those curious about the foundations of grammar. |