San Francisco Javier Entre Dos Continentes. Arellano/ Gonzalez A. / Herrera/ (Eds). Iberoamericana Vervuert |
Filósofos Cínicos: Aproximaciones Para Su Estudio Universitario Cruz Revueltas, Juan Cristóbal / Gerena Carrillo, Luis Alons Bonilla Artigas Editores |
Teatro Átmico, Sagrado Sacerdocio: Ensayo Filosófico y Teoría Científica Sobre T Rangel Mora, Zonia Editorial Verdesoma |
Concepto Poíesis en la Filosofía Griega, El: Heráclito-Sofistas-Platón Lledó, Emilio Academia Mexicana de la Lengua |
Cuadratura del Círculo Filosófico, La: Hegel, Marx, y los Marxismos Hoyo Arana, José Félix Bonilla Artigas Editores |
Título: Rationality And Logic | ||
Autor: Hanna Robert | Precio: $252.00 | |
Editorial: The Mit Press | Año: 2009 | |
Tema: Filosofia, Conocimiento, Ciencia | Edición: 1ª | |
Sinopsis | ISBN: 9780262512510 | |
In Rationality and Logic, Robert Hanna argues that logic is intrinsically psychological and that human psychology is intrinsically logical. He claims that logic is cognitively constructed by rational animals (including humans) and that rational animals are essentially logical animals. In order to do so, he defends the broadly Kantian thesis that all (and only) rational animals possess an innate cognitive "logic faculty." Hanna's claims challenge the conventional philosophical wisdom that sees logic as a fully formal or "topic-neutral" science irreconcilably separate from the species- or individual-specific focus of empirical psychology.
Logic and psychology went their separate ways after attacks by Frege and Husserl on logical psychologism_the explanatory reduction of logic to empirical psychology. Hanna argues, however, that_despite the fact that logical psychologism is false_there is an essential link between logic and psychology. Rational human animals constitute the basic class of cognizers or thinkers studied by cognitive psychology; given the connection between rationality and logic that Hanna claims, it follows that the nature of logic is significantly revealed to us by cognitive psychology. Hanna's proposed "logical cognitivism" has two important consequences: the recognition by logically oriented philosophers that psychologists are their colleagues in the metadiscipline of cognitive science; and radical changes in cognitive science itself. Cognitive science, Hanna argues, is not at bottom a natural science; it is both an objective or truth-oriented science and a normative human science, as is logic itself. |