De Somno Et Insomniis. La Vida Monástica a Través del Lecho y los Procesos del S González Dávila, María Angélica; Ríos Espinosa, María Cristi Bonilla Artigas Editores |
Sobre la Animalidad (Y Otros Textos Afines de Política Contemporánea) Villegas Contreras, Armando Bonilla Artigas Editores |
Antropologías Feministas en México: Epistemologías, Éticas, Prácticas y Miradas Berrio, Castañeda, Goldsmith, Ruiz, Salas y Valladares Bonilla Artigas Editores |
Experiencias de Bioconstrucción: Conceptos Generales y Visiones Desde México Caballero Cervantes, Alejandra; Luis Fernando Guerrero Baca Bonilla Artigas Editores |
¿Cómo Comprender Lo Social Para Colaborar en Su Cambio? Diego Quintana, Roberto Bonilla Artigas Editores |
Libertades Universitarias Bajo la Monarquía Hispánica, Las: Salamanca, México Y Pavón Romero, Armando; Blasco Gil, Yolanda Bonilla Artigas Editores |
Título: Knowledge And Networking: On Communication In The Social Sciences | ||
Autor: Oleinik, Anton | Precio: $649.00 | |
Editorial: Transaction Publishers | Año: 2016 | |
Tema: Sociologia, Novela Mexicana | Edición: 1ª | |
Sinopsis | ISBN: 9781412864077 | |
Success and career growth in academic life depend upon reaching and influencing the widest audience possible. To do so, scientists strive to develop personalized trust. They do so by establishing connections through networking and also through the strength of their arguments and the validity and reliability of their research. To secure increasingly rare tenure positions and achieve salary increases, promotions, and recognition, scholars place themselves on a continuum of priorities ranging from total emphasis on networking to complete focus on advancing knowledge. The best solution, Oleinik argues is to find some middle ground between the two extremes.
When scholars prioritize networking, he argues, science reproduces features of a "small world", in which personal connections prevail, and who knows whom matters more than who knows what. In this scenario, one's status derives more from affiliation with a specific group of scholars or a particular university than from advancing knowledge. Acknowledging that it would be a mistake to consider networking the main source of evils in social science, Oleinik instead criticizes the decisions scholars make to focus on networking, instead of struggling to find that middle ground between networking and advancing knowledge, and managing conflicts between these priorities. The fierce competition for increasingly scarce research funds, and the difficulty of finding jobs in academia underlines the growing importance of the career choices made by an academic. Though Oleinik focuses particularly on the social sciences, his ideas are just as relevant to other disciplinary areas |